Saturday, February 22, 2014

WILL #15

What I Learned Lately (WILL 13/14 #15) by by Dr. Josh Garcia

2/14/2014
“Show Me the Love, Show me the Evidence”

Show me the evidence… Often we talk about really big concepts and challenges in an abstract manner without very many specifics or evidence. These conversation can be grounded in emotions or hunches but they may not be “evidence based”. I believe there is various forms evidence, data from numbers, observations similar to clinical rounds and even firsthand experiences. We use these types of practices and knowledge to engage ourselves and colleagues in action planning that will positively change the trajectory of our results. Recently, I was listening to a great leader in our community discussing the roles of architecture and execution in social change.

In leadership, is architecture or execution more important? In our work we spend a lot of time discussing, debating, dismissing and deciding on the plans or the architecture of our plans. We discuss whether it is “best practice” and often give it permission to move along without success criteria. We do this, because we recognize that there is not “a silver bullet” or single solution to the complexity of our challenges. I have been wrestling with the notion that the plan doesn’t
matter if we can’t execute it. Although this may seem like common sense to many, for me I have become more reflective about the idea that execution may be the missing piece for our work. Do we spend enough time analyzing the execution of our plans or do we dismiss our results because of poor plans? Do we give enough credit to those who execute without dismissing it as luck? Do we hide “average” because we are fearful that we may not get “better”? For me, these past weeks have been wondering do we need new plans or do we just need to be better at the plans we have?

Finally from Dejan Stojanovic
“The most complicated skill is to be simple.”
 

Sunday, February 16, 2014

Jump! How high?





Photo credit: Ken Kennedy http://www.flickr.com/photos/kkennedy/732037622/sizes/l/

I work in an organization with many subgroups, one of which is education. As I have gotten a better understanding of the larger institution, it has been interesting to see how new initiatives land in different ways across the subgroups. It seems to me that when our administration puts forth a new policy, the educators have been the ones most concerned with compliance. How can we be sure we are following the rules? Other groups may consider it, look into how it fits with their desired framework, and sometimes even...determine how to subvert it. When I see the differences in how policy is enacted across groups, it makes me wonder about teachers' compulsions to follow the rules.  Sometimes, to our own detriment. Where is our subversive element? Where is our creativity in enacting policy?  Perhaps it's in our DNA to comply. Perhaps we follow rules because we want others to do the same and perceive they are a vital ingredient for order, something we are trained to plan for in our classes. Perhaps, it's fear or a sense of powerlessness. But when new rules harm our profession, I wish we saw more of a reaction and less compliance. Are you seeing it where you are?